January 27, 2016

2016 Runs for Cookies Virtual 5K Results

Congratulations to everyone who completed the Virtual 5K on Monday! When I first thought of the idea for a virtual race on my 31st birthday, I never imagined it would turn into an annual thing. It's been so fun to see people from all over the globe running 5K on the same day. Here are some fun stats:

A whopping 50+% of participants completed the race on a treadmill! I'm not sure why this surprised me so much. This was actually the first year that I did my race outside--in the past, I've used the treadmill. The weather has been very wacky this year!


Over 80% of participants reached the goal they'd set when they signed up.


Here is how the age groups broke down. Not surprisingly, there was an overwhelming ratio of female to male participants. Only six were male, and two of those were my own children ;)


And finally, here are the individual results (as of 1:00 pm today... if you submitted your result after that, it won't be on here). Because of the large size of this chart, I had to truncate this post, so you'll have to click through to see the individual results...


Name
Age Group
Finish Time
Place
Christie S
Female 0-15
0:35:15
Danville, IN
Jennifer
Female 0-15
0:38:29

Tiffanie W.
Female 21-24
0:25:28
Minneapolis, MN
Karen
Female 21-24
0:27:36
Belgium
Jerica Peterson
Female 21-24
0:30:44
Gilbert, AZ USA
Leah
Female 21-24
0:37:15
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Sarah
Female 21-24
0:42:54
Canberra, Australia
Tiffany Fox 
Female 21-24
0:45:05
Ohio 
Amy Swithers
Female 21-24
0:55:01
Clermont, Florida
Lindsey
Female 25-30
0:28:14
Pflugerville, TX
Sarah H
Female 25-30
0:28:19
Winchester, UK
Brittany Wade
Female 25-30
0:28:57
Louisiana
Staci K
Female 25-30
0:29:25
Gig Harbor, WA
Katie N
Female 25-30
0:30:00
Hudson, Il
Amanda Karnitz
Female 25-30
0:30:31
Milwaukee, WI
Amanda Urbanski
Female 25-30
0:30:37
Cattaraugus New York
Amy Bottomley
Female 25-30
0:30:39
Sydney, Australia
Dominique 
Female 25-30
0:31:00
Shreveport 
Shelley 
Female 25-30
0:31:10

Catherine
Female 25-30
0:31:12
Michigan 
Kari
Female 25-30
0:31:30
Indianapolis, IN
Celia Tovar-Petty
Female 25-30
0:31:58
Redford, MI
Marine B.
Female 25-30
0:33:25
Achères, France
Cassie
Female 25-30
0:33:49
Richfield, Minnesota
Olivia
Female 25-30
0:35:42
Philadelphia, PA
Jen B
Female 25-30
0:36:21
Virginia 
Stephanie Bingham
Female 25-30
0:37:11
Pingree/Idaho 
Jennifer F.
Female 25-30
0:37:45
Kigali, Rwanda
MH
Female 25-30
0:41:20
Louisiana 
Melissa Anderson
Female 25-30
0:42:37
Canton, Mi
Bridgette
Female 25-30
0:42:52
Sterling Heights, MI
Stephanie Gerbasio
Female 25-30
0:45:00
New Jersey
Victoria
Female 25-30
0:46:05
Houston
Sarah S
Female 25-30
0:49:10
Ontario, Canada
Amber 
Female 25-30
0:50:00
Kirkland, WA
Stephanie Taylor
Female 25-30
0:50:22
Haubstadt/Indiana/USA
Robyn 
Female 25-30
0:52:50
Salt Lake City, Utah
Dana Llano
Female 25-30
0:56:25
Newark, DE
Abby S.
Female 25-30
0:58:00
Wisconsin
Nichole 
Female 25-30
1:02:00
Terre Haute, Indiana 
Roxanne
Female 25-30

New Mexico
Alicia Rocca
Female 25-30

Edwardsville, IL
Katie
Female 25-30

Mesa/Arizona/USA 
Kelly
Female 25-30

London ontario
Cassie A.
Female 25-30

Tulsa
Nichole
Female 25-30

Kelowna, BC Canada
Liz Z
Female 31-34
0:24:03
Boston, MA
Lyndsey
Female 31-34
0:24:19
Akron, OH
Laura Ltd.
Female 31-34
0:25:56
Bethesda, MD
Kate
Female 31-34
0:26:05
Australia
Megan M
Female 31-34
0:27:42
Farmington/NM/USA
Jessi Mouqué 
Female 31-34
0:28:03
Brussels Belgium 
Ashley
Female 31-34
0:28:45
Cincinnati, OH
Melissa 
Female 31-34
0:29:24
Cleveland, OH 
Mary Olsen
Female 31-34
0:29:30
Decatur, GA
Stephanie W
Female 31-34
0:29:39
Maplewood, MN
Julie
Female 31-34
0:31:46
Chanhassen, MN
Mara Schneider
Female 31-34
0:32:05
Minneapolis, MN
Katie Foster
Female 31-34
0:32:28
Newport, MI
Becky
Female 31-34
0:35:00
UK
Theresa
Female 31-34
0:35:12
Alabama
Mary
Female 31-34
0:36:18
Tennessee
Carey Bower
Female 31-34
0:37:40
Toronto
Lisa Posner
Female 31-34
0:37:47
Norwood, MA
Sabrina
Female 31-34
0:38:14
Miami, FL
Suzanne
Female 31-34
0:38:17
New Zealand
Jennifer F.
Female 31-34
0:39:40
Los Angeles, CA
Corinne 
Female 31-34
0:41:53
WA
Kandi O
Female 31-34
0:42:16
Wyoming
Laura Z
Female 31-34
0:45:14
McFarland, Wi
Kate Beckman
Female 31-34
0:47:59
Denver, Colorado
Jess
Female 31-34
0:51:50
Mesa, Az
Angela B.
Female 31-34
0:52:16
Los Angeles, CA
Lisa D
Female 31-34
0:53:10
Indiana 
Emily D. McMahon
Female 31-34
0:55:27
Ogdensburg, NY, USA
Bronwen
Female 31-34
0:56:00
Labrador, Canada
Jenny
Female 31-34
0:56:59
Schaumburg, IL
Amie S.
Female 31-34
0:59:16
UT
Ally Cathey
Female 31-34
1:01:00
High Point, NC
Stefanie
Female 31-34
1:15:00
Oklahoma
Maranda
Female 31-34

Arkansas
Danielle
Female 31-34

Bellevue, WA, USA
Alisha Howard
Female 31-34

Colorado
Sara Larsen
Female 31-34

Minnesota
Brandi J
Female 31-34

Iowa
Leisa R
Female 35-39
0:00:12
Albuquerque, New Mexico
Lisa Whitney
Female 35-39
0:27:48
Reno, NV
Joy
Female 35-39
0:30:21
Kampala, Uganda
Emilie F
Female 35-39
0:30:34
St Paul, MN
Laney Strange
Female 35-39
0:30:38
Memphis, TN
Delphine
Female 35-39
0:30:49
Evian, France
Michelle C.
Female 35-39
0:32:27
Keene, NH
Erika
Female 35-39
0:33:52
Sylvania, Oh
Christy Moody
Female 35-39
0:34:01
Flat Rock, Alabama
Renee
Female 35-39
0:34:17
Oak Park, IL
Jen Buhler
Female 35-39
0:35:00
Manitoba, canada
Rachel P.
Female 35-39
0:36:13
Honolulu, HI
Heather 
Female 35-39
0:37:11
Saint Clair Shores, MI USA
Kiersten
Female 35-39
0:38:06
Travelers Rest, SC
Amy Burkitt
Female 35-39
0:38:32
Waverly, Ohio
Amy Thomas
Female 35-39
0:38:59
Cincinnati, OH, USA
Marion
Female 35-39
0:39:14
Germany (Black Forest)
Tracy
Female 35-39
0:39:21
Spokane, Washington
Danielle!
Female 35-39
0:40:05
La Fayette, GA
Veronica
Female 35-39
0:40:09
Mason
Alicia
Female 35-39
0:40:50
San Pedro, Ambergris Caye, Belize
Tomie Vowell
Female 35-39
0:42:24
Pearl City, HI
Jem
Female 35-39
0:43:00
Norristown, PA
Jennifer
Female 35-39
0:45:00
Vermont
Kendra
Female 35-39
0:45:54
Coaldale, AB
America Grelinger
Female 35-39
0:46:38
Floyd's Knobs, IN
Beth D
Female 35-39
0:46:52
MN
Erin
Female 35-39
0:47:00
Kansas
Selena Boulianne
Female 35-39
0:48:46
Ontario, Canada
Jennifer G
Female 35-39
0:50:02
Near Rochester, NY
Nadine
Female 35-39
0:53:32
Rutledge, Tennessee
Stephanie Barnes
Female 35-39
0:55:39
Douglasville GA
@cllxo
Female 35-39
0:56:43
Indiana 
Jennifer Moody
Female 35-39
0:58:06
Austin, Texas
Sherry Walker 
Female 35-39
1:03:16
Hagerstown/MD/USA 
Missy G
Female 35-39
1:14:00
Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Jen
Female 35-39

Lititz, PA
Shannon
Female 35-39

Virginia
Jerri D
Female 35-39

Iowa
Heather Gosch
Female 40-44
0:24:59
Rapid City, SD
Jodi McCoy
Female 40-44
0:28:55
Canal Winchester, Ohio
Melissa
Female 40-44
0:30:00
Silver Spring, MD
Stephanie Hawkins
Female 40-44
0:30:10
Newport, MI
Shayne
Female 40-44
0:30:59
Spokane, Washington
Laura Boge
Female 40-44
0:31:00
Michigan
Banana
Female 40-44
0:31:09
Sylvania, Ohio 
TeriRae
Female 40-44
0:32:40
Kansas
Vicki Foss
Female 40-44
0:33:38
Brainerd MN
Charlie's Bird
Female 40-44
0:34:03
South Africa
Jeanie Henrion
Female 40-44
0:34:09
Rockford, Illinois
Dawn H
Female 40-44
0:34:51
Highlands Ranch, CO
Jamie Sauermann
Female 40-44
0:35:02
TX
Mig
Female 40-44
0:36:14
Cicero NY
Regina H
Female 40-44
0:36:14
Ohio
Sara
Female 40-44
0:37:00
Livonia, MI
Laurie Berrios
Female 40-44
0:37:00
Kingston, NY
Mary
Female 40-44
0:37:32
Sacramento, CA
CC
Female 40-44
0:39:00
Utah
August M
Female 40-44
0:39:23
Woodbridge, VA, USA
Michelle G.
Female 40-44
0:42:00
Waterville, OH
Amy Winebarger
Female 40-44
0:42:02
Madison, AL
Melissa M
Female 40-44
0:43:10
Maumee, OH
Sharon
Female 40-44
0:45:32
Canada
Kristievee
Female 40-44
0:46:00
Kernersville, NC
Jenny Castillo
Female 40-44
0:50:30
Carol Stream IL
Erica L 
Female 40-44
0:52:42
Portland, OR
Erin 
Female 40-44
0:55:00
Franklin IN
Jennifer Vandenberg
Female 40-44
1:00:04
Napavine, WA
Shawn V
Female 40-44

Iowa
Becky Ross
Female 40-44

Wausau, WI
Amber Milburn
Female 40-44

Geyser, Montana
Christie Hough
Female 40-44

Fishers, Indiana
Marie
Female 40-44

Chicago, IL
Kimberly in NC
Female 45-49
0:30:12
Wilson ,NC
Marianne M.
Female 45-49
0:30:23
Walker, LA, USA
Susan
Female 45-49
0:36:03
Georgia
Lareina Grosse
Female 45-49
0:38:00
Haida Gwaii, Canada
Shanon Merkel
Female 45-49
0:41:13
Clovis, CA
Leigh
Female 45-49
0:41:31
Brainerd, MN
Kathy
Female 45-49
0:42:00
Aiken, SC 
Teresa
Female 45-49
0:42:40
Richmond, Missouri
Angie Veith
Female 45-49
0:42:43
Rushville, IL
Gina
Female 45-49
0:45:45
California
Corry
Female 45-49
0:47:08
Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada 
Karen McBride
Female 45-49
1:01:38
Mesa, Arizona
LisaF
Female 45-49
1:06:21
Yerington, NV, USA
Jennifer Kluender
Female 45-49
1:30:00
Gibsonia, PA
Jodi Fenley 
Female 45-49

Newton, Iowa
Kim
Female 45-49

Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Angie H
Female 45-49

Iowa
Kathy McElhaney
Female 50-54
0:28:11
Honolulu, HI
Cathy
Female 50-54
0:29:30
Orland Park, Il
MaryEllen
Female 50-54
0:29:55
Jamestown, ND
Sheila P.
Female 50-54
0:37:35
Belleville, MI
Sheri Montgomery
Female 50-54
0:54:29
Colorado Springs, CO
Lora
Female 50-54
0:57:32
Arkansas 
Mary O
Female 50-54

Georgetown, Texas
Lisa S.
Female 50-54

Yerington, NV
Tracy W
Female 55-59
0:33:30
Ashtabula Ohio
Melody McNeilly Kesler
Female 55-59
0:34:04
Edwardsburg, Michigan
Claire Vukovich
Female 55-59
0:37:50
Evansville IN
Terry Foster
Female 55-59
1:10:00
Monroe, MI
Cathi
Female 55-59

Texas
Vickie
Female 60+

Rockwood, Michigan
Sue (Katie's Mom)
Female 60+

Newport MI
Deb N
Female 60+

Iowa
Zach F
Male 0-15
1:06:19
Yerington, NV, USA
Noah Foster
Male 0-15

Newport, MI
Eli Foster
Male 0-15

Newport, MI
Sam Webster
Male 21-24
0:27:59
Los Angeles, California
Tom Strange
Male 45-49
0:38:00
Memphis, lTN
vicki
Male 50-54

Buffalo 

Thank you again to everyone that ran "with" me on my birthday! XO

January 26, 2016

Starting the 80/20 plan

My birthday yesterday was fantastic--thanks for all the birthday wishes! And for those of you that participated in the fourth annual virtual 5K, thank you for that as well :) It's been super fun to see the pictures and read about the experiences from the runners/walkers.


I posted recently about the 80/20 running plan, and decided to go ahead and officially start doing it over the weekend. And since I have such an ambitious goal (to PR my 10K on April 10th), I figured I might as well do the "level 3" training plan (the most advanced). It's not a very difficult plan in terms of the workouts, but it is high in mileage. There are even days where I am scheduled for two runs in a day! I've never done plans like that before, and I'm actually looking forward to doing something new. Since 80% or more of the running is done at a low heart rate, the chances of overtraining/getting injured are slim.

I can't post the whole plan here, because it's not a free plan--it's in the 80/20 Running book. But here is a sample week (you'll have to click to make it bigger):


This is actually my schedule for this week. I typed it all out and color coded it, so I could see at a glance what I was getting myself into. The orange runs are all done at a low heart rate (very light, easy running). The green one adds in Zone 3, which is a tempo pace; and the purple adds in Zone 4, which is about 90-95% of my maximum heart rate (there are also Zone 5 runs, which are short sprints). Some of the orange runs can be subbed with cross-training, so I'll probably do that once in a while too (especially when it gets nice enough to ride my bike outside).

At my current fitness level, my "zones" are like this:

Zone 1: HR 125-135 bpm
Zone 2: HR 135-147 bpm
Zone 3: HR 160-167 bpm (about the pace I can hold for an hour--8:20 ish?)
Zone 4: HR 170-175 bpm (about 7:25-7:45 pace)
Zone 5: HR 177+ bpm (sprints--basically as fast as I can do those segments)

The book says that for runs in Zones 1 and 2, you should use your heart rate as your guide. For Zone 3, you should use a combination of heart rate and pace. For Zones 4-5, the intervals are so short that you can't really use HR as a good guide, because of the lag (it takes 30 seconds or so for your heart to get up there). In that case, you should use perceived exertion and pace.

Anyway, yesterday, I had a 45-minute run on the schedule: 5 minutes at Zone 1, 35 minutes at Zone 2, and 5 minutes at Zone 1. It went really well! At Zone 1, I just ran as slowly as I could without looking at my heart rate every second, and it's super comfortable to run in that zone. After five minutes, I bumped up the pace just slightly, in order to get my heart rate over 135, but under 147. I've been getting pretty good at running this pace by feel and not having to constantly speed up or slow down. Again, it's comfortable, and as much as my legs want to go faster, I just fully enjoy taking it easy.

It's interesting, because when I started the lower heart rate training (about five weeks ago), my pace was in the mid-11:00's when my heart rate was about 145. For the past week or so, my pace has been in the mid-10:00's for the same heart rate. That's a good thing--it's exactly what is supposed to happen with enough patience ;)

I tried doing HR training (MAF training) in summer 2014, but that plan was different because you could NEVER run at a higher heart rate unless it was during a race. My pace was ridiculously slower than what I was used to, and I just didn't have the patience to keep doing it. Now, I feel like I'm in a much better place mentally to give this training my full attention.

Here is a comparison of two similar easy runs--one from yesterday and one from January 3rd:


The only reason that the pace was slower in the first and fourth miles of the run yesterday was because of my Zone 1 warm-up and cool down. But if you compare the middle miles of each run, the pace was at 11:29-11:40 on Jan. 3rd; and yesterday, it was 10:18-10:33. My heart rate was the same for each run. It's fun to see the numbers as proof that it's working!

I got a few questions about the 80/20 Running plan (the book by Matt Fitzgerald), so I thought I'd address them here in case anyone else was wondering the same thing:

1) Is this good for a beginner?
*Yes! Running with 80% at easy pace and 20% at moderate to difficult pace is ideal for 99% of the population. This information was nothing new to me when I read the book, but the book explained the WHY so well that it made me want to actually commit to doing it. For beginners, you are still supposed to keep your heart rate low on the 80% runs, and for some people, that may mean walking. Even a very slow jog might make your heart rate too high--so in that case, you just walk and keep your heart rate in the zone, and over time, you'll have to push yourself more to get your heart rate into that zone (like you see from my example above).

The book has several plans for distances from 5K to marathon, but it also explains how to create your own plan so that you're doing the 80/20 principle. Don't let my sample week scare you off! That's from the advanced 10K plan, so it's certainly a lot of running. When I was doing the Hansons training, though, I felt amazing while running six days a week; so I think I will do well with this plan.

2) Is the 80/20 plan good for someone who only plans to run shorter distances, like a 5K?
*Yes! It doesn't matter the distance you plan to race--the ratio in training should still be 80/20. Obviously, you don't need to run as many miles per week to prepare for a 5K as you would for a marathon, but the ratio will still be the same.

3) Is reading the book necessary? Can't I just work on fitting my runs into that ratio?
*I highly recommend reading the book, because it explains WHY 80/20 works so well. When you learn why it works, it makes you much more motivated to do it. When I got my coaching certification, we learned all about how to put together ideal running plans, but we didn't get very much into the details of WHY those plans are ideal. The "why" is the most important part! The book is also very motivating in terms of helping runners to slow down. Most recreational runners are running their easy runs too fast, and slowing down is actually really difficult to do (mentally). You feel like you're taking a step backwards in your training, but the book details just how important it is.

4) Do you have to use a heart rate monitor to train?
*Technically, no--the book gives you alternatives. However, since most runners do their easy runs too fast, the heart rate monitor will give a definitive "cap" on how fast you go. You just run at the pace you want, as long as your heart rate doesn't go over a certain number (for the easy runs). Without using the monitor, there is a good chance you'll still run your easy runs too fast--but it's not completely necessary to have the monitor.

So far, I'm really enjoying doing the lower heart rate training. I didn't "officially" start the 80/20 plan until this weekend, but the plan I was following before was very similar and it fit into the 80/20 principle. The best part about it, for me, is that I am really enjoying my runs! I no longer dread going for a run in the morning :)


If you did the 5K yesterday, and haven't already, make sure you fill out the Finisher's Form. I'm going to compile the results and post them tomorrow. I hope you enjoyed the "race"!

January 24, 2016

2016 Runs for Cookies Virtual 5K Finishers Form

Tomorrow, January 25, this my birthday--and the fourth annual Runs for Cookies Virtual 5K! As of right now, there are 366 people signed up to run or walk 5K tomorrow. I am going to be running it as well, but at a very easy pace to stick with my training schedule. I'm looking forward to seeing the photos and reading about how it went for all of you that are participating!


At the bottom of this post, I am posting the official "Finisher's Form". After you've completed your 5K, please take a minute to fill this out. It's fun to see the demographics of the participants once all the results are in! (I'll compile the results and share them on my blog in a couple of days). I will leave the form open until Tuesday evening, and hopefully, I'll get the results up on Wednesday.

Also, after your race, I would love for you to take a picture (a selfie, or a scenic pic from your virtual race, a pic of your GPS watch, whatever you'd like...) and then post it on social media using hashtag #RfCVirtual5K. It's easiest on Facebook, because you can see the whole group of photos there pretty easily. Feel free to share as many or as few details as you want about your race--was it in a blizzard? With a group of your friends? Dog in tow? (If you can't or don't want to post to social media, don't worry about it--there is no need to email me to let me know. This whole thing is just for fun.)

Here are links to my social media accounts:

Instagram (@runsforcookies)
Twitter (@runsforcookies)
Facebook

The last few years, I've spent most of my birthday responding to the social media posts. This year, I told Jerry that for my birthday, I want us to go on a date and leave our cell phones at home. We're going to dinner and a movie tomorrow evening, just like we used to when we were dating (and we didn't have cell phones back then! haha). Anyway, I'm going to be away from the computer and all social media tomorrow, but I will go through all the posts on Tuesday. Tuesday will feel like Christmas morning when I see the posts :)

I hope everyone has a fantastic race tomorrow, and I can't wait to read all about it! Here is the finisher's form:

January 22, 2016

80/20 Running

I've really been enjoying the change I've made with my running lately. I mentioned how I always used to do my runs at that "in-between" pace--not too easy, not too hard--even though I knew it wasn't the ideal way to train. When I found this 10K training schedule several weeks ago, I decided to give it a try, and do each workout how it was supposed to be done. I decided to keep my heart rate in the aerobic zone for my easy runs, no matter how slow that pace was.

And I was surprised at just how much I enjoyed my runs! I always used to dread running, because it's so uncomfortable. Once I started running at a truly easy pace, the way I "should", I actually started looking forward to running. As far as my effort level goes, it feels almost the same as going for a walk--I don't get out of breath, and I can look around and enjoy the scenery. Nothing to dread :)

The idea of easy running wasn't new to me--I learned all about how to put together a proper training plan, and that's how I write plans for other people. But for myself, I always felt like I would make more progress by running faster, where I was slightly uncomfortable. Recently, I've been reading as much as I can about the ideal race training, and I came across a book called 80/20 Running by Matt Fitzgerald.


The idea behind 80/20 Running is that the "perfect" running plan would have you do 80% of your running at a low intensity, and just 20% at a moderate or high intensity level. The book explains it all so well, and gives tons of examples, but the key point is that most recreational runners train in that moderate zone more than half of the time, and that is keeping them from reaching their full potential. Elite runners use the 80/20 principle, which allows them to reach their maximum potential.

Even though I knew better, I still didn't do my easy runs at a truly easy pace. I would push myself to a moderate pace, because then I'd finish my mileage faster (without being too uncomfortable). The 80/20 running in the book gives workouts in minutes rather than mileage, so you're going to be running for the same amount of time regardless of pace. I think that's what helped me to finally take it easy on my runs recently, because I've been training in minutes. If I have a 40-minute run scheduled, then I have to run 40 minutes, no matter how fast or slow I go. Slower is more enjoyable, so I keep the intensity very low (unless I'm doing speed work).

Doing this has helped me to make progress on my speed work, too. On those days, I really bust my ass during my workouts. By taking it easy on my easy runs, I have lots of energy to expend on my hard runs. I've seen a pretty big improvement in just five weeks or so. I'm kind of excited to run a 5K or 10K and see the difference in my finishing time.

The book has several training plans--three each for the 5K, 10K, half-marathon, and marathon (levels 1, 2, and 3). I've been thinking about doing the 10K plan in the book (either level 2 or 3) instead of the plan I've been testing out recently. It's pretty much the same idea, just with more mileage. Surprisingly, I don't even mind doing more miles because they are EASY miles! (The book stresses that higher mileage is best for getting to your goals faster--something that I learned from Hansons Marathon Method as well).

The plans give you a certain number of minutes to run in five different zones. Zone 1 is the easiest (used for warm-ups, cool downs, and recovery runs); Zone 2 is for easy runs and long runs; Zone 3 like the aerobic threshold zone--tempo pace; Zone 4 is for longer intervals; and Zone 5 is for short intervals or hills. You can use heart rate, pace, and/or perceived effort to determine each zone, but Fitzgerald recommends a combination, which he explains in the book.


The hardest part of the whole thing is determining your lactate threshold heart rate. There are a few suggestions for how to do it, but I still felt kind of lost. It's not as simple as a formula. I went for a run today and tried a couple of the tests (a talk test, perceived effort, etc.).

I really liked testing out the Hansons Marathon Method when I trained for the Chicago Marathon. I followed the program right to the letter, and it was fun to write a review about it (the plan worked very well for me). So, I'm leaning toward doing this 80/20 Running plan--I'd follow it as-written, and see how well it works in getting me ready to PR my 10K. The plan is 12 weeks long, and my race is 11 weeks from Sunday, so I would have to start this plan tomorrow with tail end of week 1. The thought of focusing on a single race, and preparing for it to the best of my ability exciting to me--the last time I felt this focused on a goal race was the Chicago Marathon in 2013!

Reading 80/20 Running was very reassuring that training at an easy pace is ideal. It gave so many examples and studies that made me really believe in it. I was worried that I wasn't doing enough speed work, but from what I've read, the plan I've been doing follows the right formula. And I've seen progress, so I think it's working. Regardless of whether I'm getting faster or not, it's so nice to really enjoy running. I still dread speed work, but I feel awesome when I nail a good speed workout, so it's worth it.

I'm curious, have any of you ever tried any of the 80/20 Running plans? And if so, did you find that you got faster by training that way?

Here is a link (Amazon affiliate) for the book, if anyone is interested: 80/20 Running: Run Stronger and Race Faster By Training Slower. I want to stress that this is NOT a good book for an electronic reader. The training plans will have you flipping back and forth between several pages, which would drive me crazy. I'm really glad that I bought the actual book. It's a very interesting read, and if you're in a pace rut (having a hard time improving), it could help you out of that.

January 21, 2016

Getting my speed back

After having a bad run on Tuesday, I really wanted today's run to go smoothly. I always feel amazing after I do well on a tough run, and my Tuesday/Thursday runs are speed work. It snowed again yesterday, and the streets are covered, so I had to do the treadmill today. I always worry that the treadmill isn't as good as running outside, even though experience shows me that it makes no difference.

On the schedule today:
16 minutes easy (heart rate under 146)
12 minutes at tempo pace (8:20-ish)
2 minutes hard (7:30-ish)
16 minutes easy
12 minutes at tempo pace
2 minutes hard
10 minutes easy

A total of 70 minutes--that's only 5 minutes less than my longest run on the schedule! Thankfully, it wasn't TOO cold today (21 degrees). Even with my treadmill being in the garage, the temperature is the same as outside. The only bonus is that there isn't any wind.

I ran the first 16 minutes, and then just hoped that I didn't get the muscle spasm during the tempo part. Switching to the 8:20 pace actually felt good, and wasn't very difficult at all. My heart rate was in the tempo zone, which is good. It wasn't "comfortable", like an easy run, but it wasn't torture, either. I felt like I could have run several miles at that pace. After 12 minutes, I bumped the pace to 7:30, and even that didn't feel too bad. It was hard, for sure, but I felt good... especially knowing I only had to hold that pace for two minutes.

I switched back to easy pace, and 37 minutes into the workout, I could feel the muscle spasm. It gets really tight, to the point where I can't even stand up straight. I was tempted to call it quits, but the pain wasn't half as bad as it was on Tuesday, so I decided to try to keep running. By the time the easy portion was over, the spasm was nearly gone. I finished out the tempo and hard pace parts, and then ran easy for 10 minutes--70 minutes, run and done!


I'm really glad that I stuck it out. I never feel good about myself if I cut a run short (actually, I very rarely even do that). It feels good to find faster paces are starting to feel easier. This training is starting to pay off! Now, I just have 11 weeks to get in shape to PR my 10K.


If you haven't already, make sure you check out the Runs for Cookies Virtual 5K details and sign up! You can run or walk, outside or on a treadmill, a track, or whatever else you'd like. It takes place on Monday (my birthday!). I haven't really decided what I'm going to do yet--if I should run it hard or just stick to my running schedule (actually, I'm not even scheduled to run that day).


Featured Posts

Blog Archive